This first Oecumenical Council is of the highest importance in the history of Christianity. Its convocation by Constantine shows the place which Christianity had become in the whole region and the confines of the Roman empire. And this within months of the conquest of the Eastern provinces, and primarily to deal with the Arian problem.  It should perhaps be noted that for Constantine his main interest was to maintain unity. And besides Bishop Hosius, it seems that Eustathius, Bishop of Antioch took some lead and authority. The two terms that came to the expression of most importance in the Nicene Creed were Homoousion (Gk. of one substance) to express the relations of the Son with the Father. And also perhaps the preferred term Homoiousion (Gk. of like substance with The Father), which was held to leave more room for the distinctions in the Godhead.

And later there was the longer formula, also known as the ‘Niceno-Constanopolitan Creed.’  It needs to be said, that the later Eucharist worship, and the added Filioque in the early Middle Ages, was not and never really accepted with the East and Orthodoxy. And many today in the Anglican Church, as in the Orthodox do not accept the filioque.

3 Responses to “First Council of Nicaea (325)”

  1. gentleexit Says:

    and after Nicea, Homoousion wasn’t accepted without struggle and time. The Arian dispute went on and on. It dogged (http://www.conorpdowling.com/40/his-last-fight) old Hosius until the end of his days.

  2. irishanglican Says:

    Hosius, Bishop of Cordova (257-359).

    After Nicaea Hosius presided in 343 at the fruitless synod of Sardica, which showed itself so hostile to Arianism. And afterwards he supported Athanasius in such a way as to bring upon himself the sentence of banishment to Sirmium (355). From his exile he wrote Constantius II (Constantius II was an Arian emperor). In Milan he was forced to sign the second creed of the Council known as “the blasphemy.” He repudiated the creed before his death.


  3. [...] acknowledge [1] the significance of Nicea, saying that it merely affirmed the obvious [2] [3] [4] [5] with protestants, if they address it at all, adding that its conclusions are clear from the [...]


Leave a Reply